<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 973 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a resin, paints, and varnish manufacturer against the disallowance of Cenvat credit due to a defect in the service provider&#039;s address on the invoice. The Tribunal held that the manufacturer was entitled to the credit as the essential details for availing credit were present, and the service provider had fulfilled tax obligations. The disallowance and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside, granting the manufacturer Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 94,239.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 973 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a resin, paints, and varnish manufacturer against the disallowance of Cenvat credit due to a defect in the service provider&#039;s address on the invoice. The Tribunal held that the manufacturer was entitled to the credit as the essential details for availing credit were present, and the service provider had fulfilled tax obligations. The disallowance and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside, granting the manufacturer Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 94,239.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>