https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336324 The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal, allowing both appeals and granting the appellants entitlement to consequential benefits. The Tribunal held that the suppression alleged by the Department was not sustainable, and the demand raised under the extended period and the invocation of the proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 11 A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were not valid. en-us Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336324 The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal, allowing both appeals and granting the appellants entitlement to consequential benefits. The Tribunal held that the suppression alleged by the Department was not sustainable, and the demand raised under the extended period and the invocation of the proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 11 A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were not valid. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336324