<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 960 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336315</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment orders for the years 2011-2014 that included quantity discounts in turnover. The Court emphasized that trade discounts should not automatically increase turnover unless additional amounts were realized, in line with Circular No. 5/05 and Ext.P6 clarifying Section 7 of the KVAT Act. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to consider this interpretation, despite accepting it in previous assessments, rendered the current assessment inconsistent. The Court directed a review of the matter in accordance with Ext.P6, highlighting that trade discounts should not inflate turnover without additional amounts being received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:03:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 960 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336315</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment orders for the years 2011-2014 that included quantity discounts in turnover. The Court emphasized that trade discounts should not automatically increase turnover unless additional amounts were realized, in line with Circular No. 5/05 and Ext.P6 clarifying Section 7 of the KVAT Act. The assessing officer&#039;s failure to consider this interpretation, despite accepting it in previous assessments, rendered the current assessment inconsistent. The Court directed a review of the matter in accordance with Ext.P6, highlighting that trade discounts should not inflate turnover without additional amounts being received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>