https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311 The court allowed the applications for intervention/impleadment by The All India Glass Manufacturers, permitting them to be joined as respondent No.3 in the writ petitions challenging the final findings and procedure of the Designated Authority under the Antidumping Rules. The court found the applicant, as the party on whose application the investigation was initiated, to be a necessary party under rule 5 of the rules, emphasizing the appeal process against the final findings. Consequently, the court made the rule absolute in each application, with no order as to costs, and directed the registry to amend the causetitle of each writ petition accordingly. en-us Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311 The court allowed the applications for intervention/impleadment by The All India Glass Manufacturers, permitting them to be joined as respondent No.3 in the writ petitions challenging the final findings and procedure of the Designated Authority under the Antidumping Rules. The court found the applicant, as the party on whose application the investigation was initiated, to be a necessary party under rule 5 of the rules, emphasizing the appeal process against the final findings. Consequently, the court made the rule absolute in each application, with no order as to costs, and directed the registry to amend the causetitle of each writ petition accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311