https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311 A domestic industry applicant that triggered an anti-dumping investigation had a direct and substantial interest in writ petitions challenging the Designated Authority's final findings under rule 17 of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995. The statutory scheme contemplated further proceedings against the Central Government's notification under section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and rule 5(2) of the CEGAT Procedure Rules recognised the domestic industry representative as a person to be joined in the appeal. On that basis, the applicant could not be excluded from the proceedings and was entitled to be impleaded as respondent No. 3. en-us Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311 A domestic industry applicant that triggered an anti-dumping investigation had a direct and substantial interest in writ petitions challenging the Designated Authority's final findings under rule 17 of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995. The statutory scheme contemplated further proceedings against the Central Government's notification under section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and rule 5(2) of the CEGAT Procedure Rules recognised the domestic industry representative as a person to be joined in the appeal. On that basis, the applicant could not be excluded from the proceedings and was entitled to be impleaded as respondent No. 3. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336311