https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188879 The SC determined that a dispute is not pending before an industrial Tribunal for the purposes of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, when the order of reference is stayed. Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction during the stay, and the dismissal of workmen did not violate Section 33(2)(b). The SC allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and dismissed the complaint as not maintainable, affirming that the workmen could pursue other legal remedies regarding their dismissal. en-us Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188879 The SC determined that a dispute is not pending before an industrial Tribunal for the purposes of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, when the order of reference is stayed. Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction during the stay, and the dismissal of workmen did not violate Section 33(2)(b). The SC allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and dismissed the complaint as not maintainable, affirming that the workmen could pursue other legal remedies regarding their dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188879