https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878 The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the amendments to the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act, 1960, holding that the amendments did not impose additional restrictions requiring Presidential sanction or infringe upon fundamental rights. The amendments were deemed procedural enforcement measures to maintain the quality and trade of Mysore silk in the public interest. The Court concluded that the changes did not significantly increase restrictiveness and were within the scope of the Principal Act. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 02 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:03:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878 The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the amendments to the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act, 1960, holding that the amendments did not impose additional restrictions requiring Presidential sanction or infringe upon fundamental rights. The amendments were deemed procedural enforcement measures to maintain the quality and trade of Mysore silk in the public interest. The Court concluded that the changes did not significantly increase restrictiveness and were within the scope of the Principal Act. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878