https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878 A writ petition under Article 32 was maintainable because a challenge to amendments said to be unlawful could directly affect the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g); the preliminary objection was rejected. The amendments to the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act were held not to impose any real additional burden on trade and commerce, as the principal Act already contained a detailed licensing and regulatory scheme. Changes that strengthened enforcement, altered form, and increased penalties were treated as regulatory measures rather than fresh restrictions, so no new Presidential sanction under Article 304(b) was required. en-us Fri, 02 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:03:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878 A writ petition under Article 32 was maintainable because a challenge to amendments said to be unlawful could directly affect the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g); the preliminary objection was rejected. The amendments to the Mysore Silkworm Seed and Cocoon Act were held not to impose any real additional burden on trade and commerce, as the principal Act already contained a detailed licensing and regulatory scheme. Changes that strengthened enforcement, altered form, and increased penalties were treated as regulatory measures rather than fresh restrictions, so no new Presidential sanction under Article 304(b) was required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 May 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188878