https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188877 The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court decisions, ruling that the appellant did not act judicially but in an executive capacity when ordering the respondent's arrest. Consequently, the Judicial Officers' Protection Act, 1850, did not apply. The arrest and detention were deemed unlawful, leading to a compensation decree of Rs. 5,000 being upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:51:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188877 The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court decisions, ruling that the appellant did not act judicially but in an executive capacity when ordering the respondent's arrest. Consequently, the Judicial Officers' Protection Act, 1850, did not apply. The arrest and detention were deemed unlawful, leading to a compensation decree of Rs. 5,000 being upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188877