<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 950 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336305</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the fair market value of the property with consideration given to its potential for commercial use, despite being legally designated for residential purposes. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately determining the fair market value for computing capital gains and the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 46A to ensure a just resolution of tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 950 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336305</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the fair market value of the property with consideration given to its potential for commercial use, despite being legally designated for residential purposes. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurately determining the fair market value for computing capital gains and the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 46A to ensure a just resolution of tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>