https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336293 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and ruling that the appellant was not in default for non-deduction of tax on VSAT and lease line charges. The appellant's non-appearance led to proceedings being conducted ex parte, but the tribunal found in favor of the appellant based on judicial consistency and past decisions, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the demand raised under sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:28:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336293 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and ruling that the appellant was not in default for non-deduction of tax on VSAT and lease line charges. The appellant's non-appearance led to proceedings being conducted ex parte, but the tribunal found in favor of the appellant based on judicial consistency and past decisions, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the demand raised under sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336293