https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336287 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided to their members, including letting out of halls, lawns, and catering services, did not qualify as "Mandap Keeper" services for service tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that the members could not be considered clients due to the mutual interest between the appellant and its members, leading to the exemption from service tax liability. The decision was supported by precedents from various High Courts and CESTAT, and the Revenue's appeal against the Appellate Authority's order was rejected. en-us Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336287 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided to their members, including letting out of halls, lawns, and catering services, did not qualify as "Mandap Keeper" services for service tax purposes. The Tribunal determined that the members could not be considered clients due to the mutual interest between the appellant and its members, leading to the exemption from service tax liability. The decision was supported by precedents from various High Courts and CESTAT, and the Revenue's appeal against the Appellate Authority's order was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336287