<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6123</link>
    <description>SC analyzed the interpretation of &quot;income derived from&quot; in section 80HH of Income-tax Act. The Court held that interest on electricity board deposits does not constitute income directly derived from an industrial undertaking. The judgment emphasized a strict interpretation requiring a direct and immediate nexus between income and business activities, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and rejecting the appellant&#039;s broader claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 12:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6123</link>
      <description>SC analyzed the interpretation of &quot;income derived from&quot; in section 80HH of Income-tax Act. The Court held that interest on electricity board deposits does not constitute income directly derived from an industrial undertaking. The judgment emphasized a strict interpretation requiring a direct and immediate nexus between income and business activities, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and rejecting the appellant&#039;s broader claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>