https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188861 The High Court criticized the Deputy Commissioner for not complying with binding judgments and court orders, despite the pendency of the matter in the Supreme Court. The court held that the Deputy Commissioner's actions were erroneous and ordered the quashing of impugned orders. Additionally, the court imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the respondents for failing to abide by established legal precedents, emphasizing the importance of respecting and applying court decisions even in the presence of pending matters in higher courts. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188861 The High Court criticized the Deputy Commissioner for not complying with binding judgments and court orders, despite the pendency of the matter in the Supreme Court. The court held that the Deputy Commissioner's actions were erroneous and ordered the quashing of impugned orders. Additionally, the court imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the respondents for failing to abide by established legal precedents, emphasizing the importance of respecting and applying court decisions even in the presence of pending matters in higher courts. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188861