<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 925 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336280</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) erred in dismissing the appeal as time-barred. The court emphasized the need for leniency towards government entities in delay cases due to bureaucratic processes. It found the appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay valid, not resulting from deliberate delay, negligence, or malice. Therefore, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside CESTAT&#039;s decision, condoned the delay, and directed CESTAT to decide the appeal on its merits, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 925 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336280</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) erred in dismissing the appeal as time-barred. The court emphasized the need for leniency towards government entities in delay cases due to bureaucratic processes. It found the appellant&#039;s explanation for the delay valid, not resulting from deliberate delay, negligence, or malice. Therefore, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside CESTAT&#039;s decision, condoned the delay, and directed CESTAT to decide the appeal on its merits, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>