<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 923 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in its entirety, ruling that interest should only be levied on the net shortfall in duty payment after adjusting excess payments on other products. The decision emphasized that interest liability does not arise if there is no shortfall in duty payment after finalization of provisional assessment, in line with relevant case laws and the interpretation of interest provisions pre and post amendment to Rule 7 (4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 923 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in its entirety, ruling that interest should only be levied on the net shortfall in duty payment after adjusting excess payments on other products. The decision emphasized that interest liability does not arise if there is no shortfall in duty payment after finalization of provisional assessment, in line with relevant case laws and the interpretation of interest provisions pre and post amendment to Rule 7 (4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>