<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336242</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the confiscation and penalty imposed on DEPB exports by customs officers in the case involving M/s Rainbow Silks. The tribunal confirmed the jurisdiction of customs authorities to penalize mis-declared goods, emphasizing that the penalty served as a deterrent against future mis-declarations. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were already exported and the penalty was disproportionate, the tribunal found no grounds to intervene, noting that the goods were allowed to be exported after complying with the order. The judgment was delivered on 08/07/2016 by Member (Technical) Shri C J Mathew.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336242</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the confiscation and penalty imposed on DEPB exports by customs officers in the case involving M/s Rainbow Silks. The tribunal confirmed the jurisdiction of customs authorities to penalize mis-declared goods, emphasizing that the penalty served as a deterrent against future mis-declarations. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were already exported and the penalty was disproportionate, the tribunal found no grounds to intervene, noting that the goods were allowed to be exported after complying with the order. The judgment was delivered on 08/07/2016 by Member (Technical) Shri C J Mathew.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>