<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1083 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s appeal against the denial of input service credit on warranty service post-sale. Relying on a precedent, it held that repair charges paid to dealers during the warranty period qualify for input service credit as they are connected to the sale of goods. The impugned orders were deemed meritless, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The application for an extension of stay was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1083 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s appeal against the denial of input service credit on warranty service post-sale. Relying on a precedent, it held that repair charges paid to dealers during the warranty period qualify for input service credit as they are connected to the sale of goods. The impugned orders were deemed meritless, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The application for an extension of stay was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>