<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 862 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the validity of the reopening of assessments. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the capital gains as genuine, allowing exemptions claimed under section 54F. Additionally, the disallowance of commission and transfer fees was set aside, pending verification by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:34:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 862 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both assessment years, upholding the validity of the reopening of assessments. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the capital gains as genuine, allowing exemptions claimed under section 54F. Additionally, the disallowance of commission and transfer fees was set aside, pending verification by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>