<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to issue the Impugned Order under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the power of revision had been replaced by the power to review from 19.08.2009 onwards. Since the Show Cause Notice was issued after this change on 23.03.2010, the Tribunal found the order to be without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Impugned Order upholding the demand of Service Tax and imposing penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to issue the Impugned Order under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the power of revision had been replaced by the power to review from 19.08.2009 onwards. Since the Show Cause Notice was issued after this change on 23.03.2010, the Tribunal found the order to be without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Impugned Order upholding the demand of Service Tax and imposing penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>