<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6112</link>
    <description>Interest awarded by an arbitrator on compensation payable under a works contract was treated as a revenue receipt and therefore taxable as income. The earlier view that such interest was not income was rejected. The Court held that the receipt could not be brought under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot; and, on the reasoning accepted, it was assessable as a business receipt. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6112</link>
      <description>Interest awarded by an arbitrator on compensation payable under a works contract was treated as a revenue receipt and therefore taxable as income. The earlier view that such interest was not income was rejected. The Court held that the receipt could not be brought under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot; and, on the reasoning accepted, it was assessable as a business receipt. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>