<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 850 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336205</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the excise duty recovery orders but maintained the Show Cause Notice for further adjudication. The petitioners were instructed to appear before the Adjudicating Authority for a new order, emphasizing the need to determine the retrospective or prospective application of the amended provision. The Court highlighted the lack of consideration of the amendment in the original order and directed the authority to address this issue. The petitioners were barred from raising limitation grounds for appellate remedy but could challenge the Show Cause Notice on limitation grounds. The writ petition was successful, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 850 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336205</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the excise duty recovery orders but maintained the Show Cause Notice for further adjudication. The petitioners were instructed to appear before the Adjudicating Authority for a new order, emphasizing the need to determine the retrospective or prospective application of the amended provision. The Court highlighted the lack of consideration of the amendment in the original order and directed the authority to address this issue. The petitioners were barred from raising limitation grounds for appellate remedy but could challenge the Show Cause Notice on limitation grounds. The writ petition was successful, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>