https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336196 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the case involving the reversal of cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the appellant engaged in sponge iron manufacturing. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's partial compliance with credit reversal but emphasized adherence to procedural requirements. Relying on Chandrapur Magnet Works (P) Ltd. vs. CCE, Nagpur, it directed the original authority to verify the proportionate reversal and rejected the full reversal demand. The appeal was remanded for further examination, granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336196 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI remanded the case involving the reversal of cenvat credit under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the appellant engaged in sponge iron manufacturing. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's partial compliance with credit reversal but emphasized adherence to procedural requirements. Relying on Chandrapur Magnet Works (P) Ltd. vs. CCE, Nagpur, it directed the original authority to verify the proportionate reversal and rejected the full reversal demand. The appeal was remanded for further examination, granting the appellant an opportunity to present their case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336196