<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration regarding the disallowance of credit on transportation during removal of excisable goods, emphasizing the need for documentary evidence and adherence to legal precedents. However, the denial of credit due to documents not in the name of the appellant company was upheld, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 832 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration regarding the disallowance of credit on transportation during removal of excisable goods, emphasizing the need for documentary evidence and adherence to legal precedents. However, the denial of credit due to documents not in the name of the appellant company was upheld, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>