https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336183 The court held that the respondent's failure to implement the appellate order without obtaining a stay was unjustified. The petitioner was entitled to the release of the detained gold for re-export, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The court directed the respondent to release the goods within two weeks and dispose of the revision petition within eight weeks if no stay was obtained. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336183 The court held that the respondent's failure to implement the appellate order without obtaining a stay was unjustified. The petitioner was entitled to the release of the detained gold for re-export, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The court directed the respondent to release the goods within two weeks and dispose of the revision petition within eight weeks if no stay was obtained. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336183