https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336179 Related exporter status justified denial of an individual dumping margin because the record supported treating the entities as part of the same group, and unsupported post-period changes did not alter that finding. The 22% return on capital used for non-injurious price calculation was upheld because it followed the Designated Authority's consistent norm and no commodity-specific evidence showed a different rate was required. Injury and causal link findings were sustained where the Authority examined import volumes, price effects, inventories and other market factors, and the challenge to import data was unsubstantiated. The sunset review finding of likely continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury was also maintained, so the anti-dumping duty remained in force. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2016 16:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336179 Related exporter status justified denial of an individual dumping margin because the record supported treating the entities as part of the same group, and unsupported post-period changes did not alter that finding. The 22% return on capital used for non-injurious price calculation was upheld because it followed the Designated Authority's consistent norm and no commodity-specific evidence showed a different rate was required. Injury and causal link findings were sustained where the Authority examined import volumes, price effects, inventories and other market factors, and the challenge to import data was unsubstantiated. The sunset review finding of likely continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury was also maintained, so the anti-dumping duty remained in force. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336179