<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336177</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of imported goods requires a reasoned, supplier-specific finding when lump-sum know-how fees or royalty are sought to be added to declared value. Where the original authority had accepted invoice values and held that royalty and technical know-how charges were not includible because they were not a condition of sale, an appellate authority could not overturn that conclusion on a general assertion alone. It had to address the specific findings and the valuation position for each supplier. In the absence of such reasoning, the appellate valuation order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 16:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336177</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of imported goods requires a reasoned, supplier-specific finding when lump-sum know-how fees or royalty are sought to be added to declared value. Where the original authority had accepted invoice values and held that royalty and technical know-how charges were not includible because they were not a condition of sale, an appellate authority could not overturn that conclusion on a general assertion alone. It had to address the specific findings and the valuation position for each supplier. In the absence of such reasoning, the appellate valuation order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>