<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 818 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336173</link>
    <description>The High Court considered a case where the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence, resulting in assessment orders being passed under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court found that the rejection of objections solely based on lack of documentary evidence violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to produce necessary documents, and the respondent was instructed to re-do assessments after affording a personal hearing, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 818 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336173</link>
      <description>The High Court considered a case where the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence, resulting in assessment orders being passed under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court found that the rejection of objections solely based on lack of documentary evidence violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to produce necessary documents, and the respondent was instructed to re-do assessments after affording a personal hearing, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>