<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1006 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188831</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had fulfilled all conditions for immunity from penalty by paying taxes and interest on the undisclosed income, without a specific deadline. The appeal was allowed, concluding that the penalty was unwarranted, and the order of the CIT(A) was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1006 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188831</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had fulfilled all conditions for immunity from penalty by paying taxes and interest on the undisclosed income, without a specific deadline. The appeal was allowed, concluding that the penalty was unwarranted, and the order of the CIT(A) was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>