https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188832 The court declined to entertain the Writ of Certiorari as the order was already under challenge before CESTAT. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appeal before CESTAT for expedited disposal. In the case of the Writ of Mandamus, the court directed CESTAT to transfer the appeal to a different Bench and dispose of it within eight weeks, allowing the petitioner to present all contentions. Both writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and the related Miscellaneous Petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:53:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188832 The court declined to entertain the Writ of Certiorari as the order was already under challenge before CESTAT. The petitioner was directed to pursue the appeal before CESTAT for expedited disposal. In the case of the Writ of Mandamus, the court directed CESTAT to transfer the appeal to a different Bench and dispose of it within eight weeks, allowing the petitioner to present all contentions. Both writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and the related Miscellaneous Petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188832