<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2589 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the admissibility of service tax credit paid by different service centers of dealers, citing a previous Final Order and agreeing that the issue was the same. The appellant was deemed entitled to input service credit on repair charges paid to dealers during the warranty period, based on activities related to the sale of goods. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, with any consequential benefits to be provided in accordance with the law. The application for an extension of stay was also disposed of in line with the decision on the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2589 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the admissibility of service tax credit paid by different service centers of dealers, citing a previous Final Order and agreeing that the issue was the same. The appellant was deemed entitled to input service credit on repair charges paid to dealers during the warranty period, based on activities related to the sale of goods. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, with any consequential benefits to be provided in accordance with the law. The application for an extension of stay was also disposed of in line with the decision on the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>