<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by setting a 15% threshold for Related Party Transactions (RPT) in selecting comparables. It directed further investigation into abnormal profit margins and turnover comparisons, following the Maersk Global Centres case. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of telecommunication and foreign currency expenses from total turnover, in line with the ACIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. decision. The judgment was pronounced on March 31, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by setting a 15% threshold for Related Party Transactions (RPT) in selecting comparables. It directed further investigation into abnormal profit margins and turnover comparisons, following the Maersk Global Centres case. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of telecommunication and foreign currency expenses from total turnover, in line with the ACIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. decision. The judgment was pronounced on March 31, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>