<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 543 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the activities constituted the production of a new article or thing, entitling the assessee to the investment allowance under section 32A. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the allowance after verifying the admissible quantum. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 543 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that the activities constituted the production of a new article or thing, entitling the assessee to the investment allowance under section 32A. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the allowance after verifying the admissible quantum. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>