https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188824 A probationer whose service is terminated in accordance with the terms of appointment, and not by way of punishment, is not entitled to Article 311(2) protection. The Court held that a probationer may be discharged during probation if the termination is non-punitive and consistent with the governing rules, and such discharge does not amount to dismissal or removal. Rule 55-B applied because the appointment letter did not exclude the service rules, and compliance was satisfied where the grounds of unsuitability were communicated, the employee was given an opportunity to respond, and the explanation was considered before termination. The termination was therefore upheld. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:46:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188824 A probationer whose service is terminated in accordance with the terms of appointment, and not by way of punishment, is not entitled to Article 311(2) protection. The Court held that a probationer may be discharged during probation if the termination is non-punitive and consistent with the governing rules, and such discharge does not amount to dismissal or removal. Rule 55-B applied because the appointment letter did not exclude the service rules, and compliance was satisfied where the grounds of unsuitability were communicated, the employee was given an opportunity to respond, and the explanation was considered before termination. The termination was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188824