<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 370 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188823</link>
    <description>Compulsory retirement under the relevant service rule is a non-punitive measure based on the Government&#039;s subjective satisfaction that retirement is in public interest. The entire service record may be considered, including uncommunicated adverse remarks, and prior communication or hearing is not required before the decision is taken. Such remarks do not by themselves invalidate the order. Judicial review is confined to limited grounds, including mala fides, absence of evidence, or arbitrariness where no reasonable person could have formed the requisite opinion. The challenge based on natural justice therefore failed, and the compulsory retirement order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 370 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188823</link>
      <description>Compulsory retirement under the relevant service rule is a non-punitive measure based on the Government&#039;s subjective satisfaction that retirement is in public interest. The entire service record may be considered, including uncommunicated adverse remarks, and prior communication or hearing is not required before the decision is taken. Such remarks do not by themselves invalidate the order. Judicial review is confined to limited grounds, including mala fides, absence of evidence, or arbitrariness where no reasonable person could have formed the requisite opinion. The challenge based on natural justice therefore failed, and the compulsory retirement order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>