<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188818</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the compulsory retirement order passed by the Government of India under Rule 16(3) of the All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules, 1958. The Court rejected allegations of mala fide intent, affirmed that adverse entries in the confidential report need not all be communicated, held that the principles of natural justice do not apply, and confirmed that the Review Committee&#039;s report was considered before the retirement order. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s order, and reinstated the compulsory retirement order, finding it justified and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188818</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the compulsory retirement order passed by the Government of India under Rule 16(3) of the All India Service (Death-cum-Retirement) Rules, 1958. The Court rejected allegations of mala fide intent, affirmed that adverse entries in the confidential report need not all be communicated, held that the principles of natural justice do not apply, and confirmed that the Review Committee&#039;s report was considered before the retirement order. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s order, and reinstated the compulsory retirement order, finding it justified and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>