https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188817 A probation rule framed in enabling terms permitted the appointing authority to fix a shorter probation period than the maximum, and the appointment conditions prescribed one year; the petitioners had therefore completed probation before their services were dispensed with. The Court also found the termination arbitrary because the stated grounds were untenable, the work continued despite dissolution of the trusts, and only the petitioners were singled out. The orders were held to violate Articles 14 and 16, were quashed, and restoration in service with consequential salary relief was directed. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188817 A probation rule framed in enabling terms permitted the appointing authority to fix a shorter probation period than the maximum, and the appointment conditions prescribed one year; the petitioners had therefore completed probation before their services were dispensed with. The Court also found the termination arbitrary because the stated grounds were untenable, the work continued despite dissolution of the trusts, and only the petitioners were singled out. The orders were held to violate Articles 14 and 16, were quashed, and restoration in service with consequential salary relief was directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188817