<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188816</link>
    <description>No substantial question of law was found because the issue was already covered by the Bombay High Court&#039;s earlier decision in M.V. Sonvala v. Commissioner of Income-Tax. The appeal was dismissed in limine on that basis, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:28:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 691 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188816</link>
      <description>No substantial question of law was found because the issue was already covered by the Bombay High Court&#039;s earlier decision in M.V. Sonvala v. Commissioner of Income-Tax. The appeal was dismissed in limine on that basis, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>