<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6097</link>
    <description>Section 115J(1) applies only after permissible deductions under the Act are taken into account to determine whether the company&#039;s assessable income falls below 30% of book profits; the deeming of total income at 30% does not ignore such deductions, but presupposes their consideration, and tax is then levied on the notional income accordingly. Section 115J(2) merely preserves the pre-existing statutory right to carry forward only those unabsorbed items (e.g., depreciation, investment allowance, business losses, and eligible deductions) that are otherwise carry-forwardable under the Act; it does not confer any additional carry-forward entitlement. As no law existed to compute income in the relevant territory before extension of the Act, no depreciation could be claimed/allowed/carried forward for pre-extension years. Appeals dismissed; HC affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6097</link>
      <description>Section 115J(1) applies only after permissible deductions under the Act are taken into account to determine whether the company&#039;s assessable income falls below 30% of book profits; the deeming of total income at 30% does not ignore such deductions, but presupposes their consideration, and tax is then levied on the notional income accordingly. Section 115J(2) merely preserves the pre-existing statutory right to carry forward only those unabsorbed items (e.g., depreciation, investment allowance, business losses, and eligible deductions) that are otherwise carry-forwardable under the Act; it does not confer any additional carry-forward entitlement. As no law existed to compute income in the relevant territory before extension of the Act, no depreciation could be claimed/allowed/carried forward for pre-extension years. Appeals dismissed; HC affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>