<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 350 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188790</link>
    <description>In a promotional recruitment rule for Deputy Director, the Court stated that the prescribed experience for Senior Geologists need not be read as experience acquired only after obtaining the post-graduate degree in Geology, because the language and promotional context did not compel that construction. It further treated the amendment deleting the experience requirement as applicable to the pending challenge, with the result that the revised rule governed the dispute and protected the appellant&#039;s promotion, as he was the senior-most Senior Geologist and no disqualification was shown under the amended provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 350 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188790</link>
      <description>In a promotional recruitment rule for Deputy Director, the Court stated that the prescribed experience for Senior Geologists need not be read as experience acquired only after obtaining the post-graduate degree in Geology, because the language and promotional context did not compel that construction. It further treated the amendment deleting the experience requirement as applicable to the pending challenge, with the result that the revised rule governed the dispute and protected the appellant&#039;s promotion, as he was the senior-most Senior Geologist and no disqualification was shown under the amended provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>