<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 788 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188786</link>
    <description>A conditional decree directing return of ornaments does not create an immediate money liability or entitle the decree-holder to interest in execution unless the condition triggering payment of the quantified value has first occurred. The decree had to be read as a whole: the obligation was to return the ornaments, and payment of their value arose only on failure to do so. Because no completed default in return was shown and no fixed time for compliance had been set, the obligor could act within a reasonable time. The execution court could not enlarge the decree, and interest was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:52:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 788 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188786</link>
      <description>A conditional decree directing return of ornaments does not create an immediate money liability or entitle the decree-holder to interest in execution unless the condition triggering payment of the quantified value has first occurred. The decree had to be read as a whole: the obligation was to return the ornaments, and payment of their value arose only on failure to do so. Because no completed default in return was shown and no fixed time for compliance had been set, the obligor could act within a reasonable time. The execution court could not enlarge the decree, and interest was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>