<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 807 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning disallowances related to depreciation on a television set and interest expenditure. However, disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source and for unverifiable expenses were upheld. The judgment was pronounced on October 21st, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 807 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning disallowances related to depreciation on a television set and interest expenditure. However, disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct tax at source and for unverifiable expenses were upheld. The judgment was pronounced on October 21st, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>