<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188781</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings could not be sustained as the assessment order did not disclose any discernible basis for their initiation. Relying on binding precedent, the HC held that the absence of recorded reasons did not give rise to a substantial question of law. The appeal consequently failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188781</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings could not be sustained as the assessment order did not disclose any discernible basis for their initiation. Relying on binding precedent, the HC held that the absence of recorded reasons did not give rise to a substantial question of law. The appeal consequently failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>