https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336152 The appellate tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal against dropping a service tax demand of Rs. 4,56,815, ruling in favor of the appellant's classification of services as manpower supply agency services rather than cargo handling services. The tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in classification and upheld the Commissioner's findings that the appellant had been correctly paying service tax under the manpower supply agency service category. The tribunal found the Revenue's arguments lacking merit and concluded that the service tax demand was unsustainable under the cargo handling services classification. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336152 The appellate tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal against dropping a service tax demand of Rs. 4,56,815, ruling in favor of the appellant's classification of services as manpower supply agency services rather than cargo handling services. The tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in classification and upheld the Commissioner's findings that the appellant had been correctly paying service tax under the manpower supply agency service category. The tribunal found the Revenue's arguments lacking merit and concluded that the service tax demand was unsustainable under the cargo handling services classification. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336152