https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336151 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, and ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the activity of leasing the Oxydeep unit did not constitute financial services subject to service tax. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions in favor of the appellant and found no reason to deviate from that view. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief by Member (Judicial) Mr. M.V. Ravindran on 02/12/16. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336151 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, and ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the activity of leasing the Oxydeep unit did not constitute financial services subject to service tax. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions in favor of the appellant and found no reason to deviate from that view. The appeal was allowed with any consequential relief by Member (Judicial) Mr. M.V. Ravindran on 02/12/16. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336151