<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 786 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim of duty collected without authority of law, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny and notification of grounds for rejection. It directed the competent authority to re-examine the claim, stressing adherence to legal procedures and the requirement to prove duty incidence for refunds, in line with recent legal amendments. The decision underscored the importance of following statutory requirements and ensuring fairness in refund processes by crediting excess duty to the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:14:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 786 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim of duty collected without authority of law, emphasizing the need for proper scrutiny and notification of grounds for rejection. It directed the competent authority to re-examine the claim, stressing adherence to legal procedures and the requirement to prove duty incidence for refunds, in line with recent legal amendments. The decision underscored the importance of following statutory requirements and ensuring fairness in refund processes by crediting excess duty to the Consumer Welfare Fund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>