https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336135 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company, setting aside the duty demand, interest, penalties, and confiscation of goods imposed by the adjudicating authority. The decision was based on the lack of corroboration of evidence and statements provided during the investigation, emphasizing the need for additional verification beyond mere admission statements. Drawing from a similar case involving M/s. Raipur Forgings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., the Tribunal concluded that the impugned orders could not be sustained without sufficient corroborative evidence, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant company. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:14:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336135 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant company, setting aside the duty demand, interest, penalties, and confiscation of goods imposed by the adjudicating authority. The decision was based on the lack of corroboration of evidence and statements provided during the investigation, emphasizing the need for additional verification beyond mere admission statements. Drawing from a similar case involving M/s. Raipur Forgings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., the Tribunal concluded that the impugned orders could not be sustained without sufficient corroborative evidence, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant company. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336135