https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336129 The adjudication order extensively analyzed incriminating evidence related to the evasion of excise duty, amounting to Rs. 12,60,279. The authority upheld the impugned order for the appellant company, imposing a penalty on the Managing Director for conscious involvement in the evasion. Despite challenges to the penalty imposition, the judgment justified the penalty based on the totality of facts and evidence presented, ultimately partly allowing the appeal of the Managing Director and dismissing the appeal of the company. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336129 The adjudication order extensively analyzed incriminating evidence related to the evasion of excise duty, amounting to Rs. 12,60,279. The authority upheld the impugned order for the appellant company, imposing a penalty on the Managing Director for conscious involvement in the evasion. Despite challenges to the penalty imposition, the judgment justified the penalty based on the totality of facts and evidence presented, ultimately partly allowing the appeal of the Managing Director and dismissing the appeal of the company. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336129