<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 773 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and emphasizing the importance of consistent interpretation of legal principles. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits, highlighting the significance of previous tribunal orders in determining liability under the notification and the necessity of careful language use in appellate decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 773 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and emphasizing the importance of consistent interpretation of legal principles. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits, highlighting the significance of previous tribunal orders in determining liability under the notification and the necessity of careful language use in appellate decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>