<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 767 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision that denied CENVAT credit for items used in the repair and maintenance of capital goods. Citing precedents and emphasizing the importance of such items in the manufacturing process, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting them relief and supporting the admissibility of the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 767 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision that denied CENVAT credit for items used in the repair and maintenance of capital goods. Citing precedents and emphasizing the importance of such items in the manufacturing process, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting them relief and supporting the admissibility of the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>