<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not required to reverse service tax credit on input services when inputs were removed from the factory. As there were no specific provisions for reversing service tax credit on input services, unlike for inputs or capital goods, the demand for service tax credit on input services was deemed unsustainable. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not required to reverse service tax credit on input services when inputs were removed from the factory. As there were no specific provisions for reversing service tax credit on input services, unlike for inputs or capital goods, the demand for service tax credit on input services was deemed unsustainable. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>