<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 994 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant manufacturer&#039;s appeal, stating they were entitled to Cenvat credit on iron and steel items if used for fabrication of capital goods, repair, and maintenance of capital goods, and for staging structures crucial for manufacturing excisable products. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of these items in the manufacturing process and directed verification of the appellant&#039;s claim before allowing the credit, highlighting the importance of proper utilization verification to determine eligibility for Cenvat credit. The case underscored the manufacturer&#039;s entitlement to credit if items were used for specific purposes outlined in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=451694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 994 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant manufacturer&#039;s appeal, stating they were entitled to Cenvat credit on iron and steel items if used for fabrication of capital goods, repair, and maintenance of capital goods, and for staging structures crucial for manufacturing excisable products. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of these items in the manufacturing process and directed verification of the appellant&#039;s claim before allowing the credit, highlighting the importance of proper utilization verification to determine eligibility for Cenvat credit. The case underscored the manufacturer&#039;s entitlement to credit if items were used for specific purposes outlined in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>